Ethridge v. Western Lithotech

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ethridge v. Western Lithotech

878 S.W.2d 519, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1058, 1994 WL 283150

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 1994·No. No. 65178·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the award of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) under the Workers’ Compensation Act.

The ALJ found that appellant does not suffer from an occupational disease as a result of his exposure to substances while in the employ of respondent Western Lithotech in that he has suffered no disability resulting in anxiety and depression. The Commission affirmed the ALJ’s award.

The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the award of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) under the Workers’ Compensation Act.

The ALJ found that appellant does not suffer from an occupational disease as a result of his exposure to substances while in the employ of respondent Western Lithotech in that he has suffered no disability resulting in anxiety and depression. The Commission affirmed the ALJ’s award.

The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Ethridge v. Western Lithotech, 878 S.W.2d 519, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1058, 1994 WL 283150 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

878 S.W.2d 519 (Ethridge v. Western Lithotech) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.