Etheridge v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Etheridge v. State

315 S.E.2d 45, 169 Ga. App. 808, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1721

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 14, 1984

Docket67423

StatusPublished

This text of 315 S.E.2d 45 (Etheridge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Etheridge v. State, 315 S.E.2d 45, 169 Ga. App. 808, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1721 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of armed robbery. On appeal he contends the trial court erred (1) by ruling on appellant’s motion for a new trial that he did not timely file a motion to suppress, and (2) by failing to suppress evidence seized after an illegal entry and an unreasonable search.

Appellant’s enumerations of error are without merit. The same enumerations of error were raised in a separate appeal by appellant’s co-defendant and decided adversely to appellant. Dennis v. State, 166 Ga. App. 715 (305 SE2d 443) (1983). We note parenthetically that whether appellant did or did not waive his right to present a motion to suppress, the court in fact heard the motion and made its ruling thereon after an evidentiary hearing.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI