Etheridge v. State

159 S.E. 747, 43 Ga. App. 579, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 468
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1931·No. 21504·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beoyles, C. J.

1. The affidavit of a juror can not be taken to impeach his verdict. Civil Code (1910), § 5933; Tolbirt v. State, 124 Ga. 767, 770 (53 S. E. 327) ; Stanley v. State, 25 Ga. App. 461 (103 S. E. 689). In the instant case-a ground of the motion for a new trial was based solely upon an affidavit of a juror alleging that during the trial one W. J. Clack said to the juror that the defendant “ought to be in the chain gang.” The court properly overruled the ground.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce, J., concurs. Bloodworfh, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Etheridge v. State, 159 S.E. 747, 43 Ga. App. 579, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 468 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

159 S.E. 747 (Etheridge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKinney v. Darby
199 S.E. 649 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)