Etheridge v. Magrino
This text of 75 A.D.2d 594 (Etheridge v. Magrino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 11, 1979, which denied her motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. There are issues of fact as to the speed of defendant’s vehicle, its distance from the car in front of it and the existence, if any, of an emergency situation which resulted in defendant’s vehicle veering into a pole to avoid the other car (see Ugarriza v Schmieder, 46 NY2d 471; Borgesano v Hertz Corp., 69 AD2d 894). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 A.D.2d 594, 426 N.Y.S.2d 790, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etheridge-v-magrino-nyappdiv-1980.