Etheridge v. Magrino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Etheridge v. Magrino

75 A.D.2d 594, 426 N.Y.S.2d 790, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11029

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 1980·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 11, 1979, which denied her motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. There are issues of fact as to the speed of defendant’s vehicle, its distance from the car in front of it and the existence, if any, of an emergency situation which resulted in defendant’s vehicle veering into a pole to avoid the other car (see Ugarriza v Schmieder, 46 NY2d 471; Borgesano v Hertz Corp., 69 AD2d 894). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 11, 1979, which denied her motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. There are issues of fact as to the speed of defendant’s vehicle, its distance from the car in front of it and the existence, if any, of an emergency situation which resulted in defendant’s vehicle veering into a pole to avoid the other car (see Ugarriza v Schmieder, 46 NY2d 471; Borgesano v Hertz Corp., 69 AD2d 894). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Etheridge v. Magrino, 75 A.D.2d 594, 426 N.Y.S.2d 790, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

75 A.D.2d 594 (Etheridge v. Magrino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related