Etheridge v. Henderson
This text of 3 S.E.2d 674 (Etheridge v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The judge’s certificate to the bill of exceptions in this case fails to certify that the same “is true,” as required by the Code, § 6-806. This court is therefore without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the exceptions, and the writ of error must be dismissed. Bell v. Stephens, 172 Ga. 610 (158 S. E. 327); Welborne v. State, 114 Ga. 793, 796 (42 S. E. 773); Blackley v. Bell, 187 Ga. 702 (1 S. E. 2d, 676).
2. While no motion has been made to dismiss the writ of error, yet where it appears that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the bill of exceptions, it can not properly do otherwise than to dismiss the writ of error upon its own motion. Welborne v. State, supra; Teasley v. Cordell, 153 Ga. 397, 400 (112 S. E. 287); Malsby v. Shipp, 177 Ga. 54 (3) (169 S. E. 308); Tillman v. Groover, 25 Ga. App. 118 (102 S. E. 879); Sellers v. McNair, 42 Ga. App. 731, 733 (157 S. E. 373).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 S.E.2d 674, 188 Ga. 189, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etheridge-v-henderson-ga-1939.