Etheridge v. Collins
471 N.E.2d 147, 63 N.Y.2d 808, 481 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4627
This text of 471 N.E.2d 147 (Etheridge v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Etheridge v. Collins, 471 N.E.2d 147, 63 N.Y.2d 808, 481 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4627 (N.Y. 1984).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judgment affirmed, without costs. Prohibition does not lie under the circumstances of this case (see Matter of Gold v Gartenstein, 54 NY2d 627; Matter of Dondi v Jones, 40 NY2d 8).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Wachtler.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dondi v. Jones
351 N.E.2d 650 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
In re Gold
425 N.E.2d 892 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
471 N.E.2d 147, 63 N.Y.2d 808, 481 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etheridge-v-collins-ny-1984.