Etheridge v. City of Roanoke Rapids
This text of 678 F. App'x 168 (Etheridge v. City of Roanoke Rapids) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Tamera L. Etheridge appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for insufficient process, insufficient service of process, and lack of personal jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Etheridge v. City of Roanoke Rapids, No. 4:15-cv-00089-BO, 2016 WL 3080788 (E.D.N.C. filed May 27, 2016 & entered May 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 F. App'x 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etheridge-v-city-of-roanoke-rapids-ca4-2017.