Etheredge, Michael Wayne
This text of Etheredge, Michael Wayne (Etheredge, Michael Wayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-90,981-01 AND WR-90,981-02
EX PARTE MICHAEL WAYNE ETHEREDGE, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 16-30043-86-F AND 16-30044-86-F IN THE 86TH DISTRICT COURT FROM KAUFMAN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault of a public servant and sentenced to thirty
years’ imprisonment in the -02 case. He subsequently pleaded guilty in exchange for a concurrent
twenty-year sentence in the -01 case. A condition of his plea agreement in the -01 case was the
waiver of appeal in the -02 case, and Applicant therefore did not appeal either conviction. Applicant
filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded them to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective in the -02 case because counsel failed
to adequately investigate, failed to argue that the physical evidence at the scene did not support the
prosecution’s theory, failed to present evidence that Applicant’s medical condition at the time of the 2
offenses would not have allowed him to brandish firearms in both hands as the complainants
testified, and failed to interview or call available witnesses at trial. In the -01 case, Applicant alleges
that he would not have pleaded guilty to that charge had trial counsel effectively represented him in
the -02 case, but would have insisted on going to trial in that case as well.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate
forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial
counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. Specifically, trial counsel shall state whether she believed
that the physical evidence supported the prosecution’s theory, whether she was aware of Applicant’s
medical condition at the time of the offenses, and if so whether she had access to evidence indicating
that Applicant could not use his right arm at the time of the offenses. Trial counsel shall also state
whether she interviewed the owners of Applicant’s residence and the people occupying the residence
across the street regarding any damage to those residences, and if so, whether she believed that their
testimony would be helpful to the defense. Trial counsel shall state what advice she gave to
Applicant with regard to his options for disposing of the -01 case following his conviction in the -02
case. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If
Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel
to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or
retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall make findings of fact 3
and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s plea in the -01 case was knowingly and voluntarily
entered. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in
response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: March 11, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Etheredge, Michael Wayne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etheredge-michael-wayne-texcrimapp-2020.