Ethel Stone Levy v. The New York Stock Exchange and Robert W. Haack, President

451 F.2d 591
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 23, 1971·No. 71-1948·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

It is clear in the instant case that there is no final judgment from which plaintiff may appeal. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291. Plaintiff originally brought suit against numerous parties, only a portion of whom were dismissed by the district court’s orders of December 16, 1970 and March 1, 1971.

It is, therefore, ordered in the above entitled and numbered cause that the attempted appeal from the district court’s order of December 16, 1970 and its order dismissing several of the defendants on March 1, 1971 is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 1

1

. See Hamman v. United States, 9th Cir. 1968, 399 F.2d 673; Partin v. Hassan Motors, Inc., 6th Cir. 1966, 363 F.2d 104; Bush v. United Benefit Fire Ins. Co., 5th Cir. 1963, 311 F.2d 893; Miles v. City of Chandler, 9th Cir. 1961, 297 F.2d 690; Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1193.2 (Wright ed. Supp. 1970) ; Moore’s Federal Practice If 54.34 [2].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ethel Stone Levy v. The New York Stock Exchange and Robert W. Haack, President, 451 F.2d 591 (5th Cir. 1971).

451 F.2d 591 (Ethel Stone Levy v. The New York Stock Exchange and Robert W. Haack, President) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Partin v. Hassan Motors, Inc.
363 F.2d 104 (Sixth Circuit, 1966)
Hamman v. United States
399 F.2d 673 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)