Ethel M. Juhnke v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Company

486 F.2d 1370, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6842
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 27, 1973·No. 73-1513·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint as beneficiary of her deceased husband who was insured by defendant’s limited travel and accident policy, on the ground that the husband’s accidental death did not come within the scope of the policy coverage, is affirmed on the basis of Judge Bogue’s opinion, reported at 358 F.Supp. 1135.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ethel M. Juhnke v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Company, 486 F.2d 1370, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6842 (8th Cir. 1973).

486 F.2d 1370 (Ethel M. Juhnke v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Juhnke v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co.
358 F. Supp. 1135 (D. South Dakota, 1973)