Ethel, Dennis Ray

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 11, 2009
DocketWR-66,517-02
StatusPublished

This text of Ethel, Dennis Ray (Ethel, Dennis Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ethel, Dennis Ray, (Tex. 2009).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NOS. WR-66,517-01 & -02
EX PARTE DENNIS RAY ETHEL, Applicant


ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 15014B & 15016B IN THE 12TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM GRIMES COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery and sentenced to two terms of ninety-two years' imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Ethel v. State, Nos. 14-04-00093-CR & 14-04-00094-CR (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.], Aug. 16, 2005, no pet.).

On February 7, 2007, we remanded these applications and directed the trial court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. On July 25, 2007, this Court reminded the trial court in a letter that its findings and conclusions were due on June 7, 2007. After granting the trial court a sixty-day extension on September 5, 2007, this Court sent a second reminder letter to the trial court on September 16, 2008. On November 20, 2008, this Court then received Applicant's motions for an indefinite extension of time. This Court denied his motions in a written order on December 10, 2008, and explained that Applicant was not precluded from supplementing and amending his applications on remand and that the trial court did not have a ministerial duty to make findings and conclusions on Applicant's supplemental claims.

These applications have been pending in the trial court on remand for over two years. This delay is unreasonable. Accordingly, the trial court shall make and forward its findings of fact and conclusions of law to this Court within 60 days of the date of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall also be forwarded to this Court within 60 days of the date of this order. No extensions of time shall be granted.

Filed: March 11, 2009



Do not publish



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ethel, Dennis Ray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ethel-dennis-ray-texcrimapp-2009.