Etheart v. Winthrop University Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Etheart v. Winthrop University Hospital

133 A.D.2d 665, 519 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51705

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 13, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 133 A.D.2d 665 (Etheart v. Winthrop University Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Etheart v. Winthrop University Hospital, 133 A.D.2d 665, 519 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries based on medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated April 7, 1986, which denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order and granted the respondents’ cross motion to compel the plaintiffs to respond to their demand for expert opinion pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (1), except to the extent of striking paragraph 1 of that demand.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion for a protective order is granted in its entirety, and the cross motion to compel the plaintiffs to respond to the demand pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (1) is denied (see, Cagatay v Caledonian Hosp., 133 AD2d 660). Niehoff, J. P., Mangano, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries based on medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated April 7, 1986, which denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order and granted the respondents’ cross motion to compel the plaintiffs to respond to their demand for expert opinion pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (1), except to the extent of striking paragraph 1 of that demand.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion for a protective order is granted in its entirety, and the cross motion to compel the plaintiffs to respond to the demand pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (1) is denied (see, Cagatay v Caledonian Hosp., 133 AD2d 660). Niehoff, J. P., Mangano, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.D.2d 665, 519 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etheart-v-winthrop-university-hospital-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack