Ethan Saenz v. Livesay Law Office

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 28, 2024
• Docket: 13-24-00298-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-24-00298-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

ETHAN SAENZ, Appellant,

v.

LIVESAY LAW OFFICE, Appellee.

ON APPEAL FROM THE 370TH DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

On June 3, 2024, appellant filed a notice of appeal attempting to appeal a judgment

or order entered in trial court cause number C-0590-24-G. On June 5, 2024, the Clerk of

the Court notified appellant that it appears there is no final, appealable order. Appellant

was further notified that if the defect was not cured within ten days, the appeal would be

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). On June 27, 2024, appellant was granted an extension of time to file a response

by July 3, 2024. On July 5, 2024, appellant requested a second extension for time to file

a response, which the Court granted until July 15, 2024. We have received no further

filings from appellant, and the defective notice of appeal remains uncured.

Appellant has not cured the defective notice of appeal, nor otherwise responded

to the notices from the clerk requiring a response or other action within the time specified;

accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).

Furthermore, appellant’s motion to extend the time to file a notice of appeal which was

previously carried on June 27, 2024, is now denied as moot.

NORA L. LONGORIA Justice

Delivered and filed on the 28th day of August, 2024.