Etchison v. State
This text of 256 S.E.2d 148 (Etchison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals his conviction for child abandonment.
1. "The question of venue is to be decided by the jury and its decision as to venue will not be set aside where there is any evidence to support it.” Johns v. State, 239 Ga. 681, 682 (238 SE2d 372). Here there was evidence that the [867]*867plaintiff lived in DeKalb County; that her child lived with her, that she lived at her present address for 3 years. This was sufficient to establish venue pursuant to Code Ann. § 74-9902 (Code § 74-9902; as amended through Ga. L. 1976, p. 1015).
2. The trial judge did not unduly restrict cross examination concerning the prosecuting witness’ association with other men. Travis v. State, 122 Ga. App. 800 (2) (178 SE2d 741).
3. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 S.E.2d 148, 149 Ga. App. 866, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etchison-v-state-gactapp-1979.