ETC Texas Pipeline, Ltd. v. XTO Energy Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

ETC Texas Pipeline, Ltd. v. XTO Energy Inc.

DecidedSeptember 12, 2024

Docket11-22-00350-CV

StatusPublished

This text of ETC Texas Pipeline, Ltd. v. XTO Energy Inc. (ETC Texas Pipeline, Ltd. v. XTO Energy Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ETC Texas Pipeline, Ltd. v. XTO Energy Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT ETC Texas Pipeline, Ltd., * From the 385th District Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. CV57367.

Vs. No. 11-22-00350-CV * September 12, 2024

XTO Energy Inc., * Opinion by Williams, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court to the extent that it found the Dedicated Acreage map was unenforceable in toto under the statute of frauds, and to the extent that the trial court’s judgment ordered Appellant take nothing on its claims for breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, fraud and string along fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit. In all other aspects, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT ETC Texas Pipeline, Ltd., * From the 385th District Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. CV57367.

Vs. No. 11-22-00350-CV * September 12, 2024

XTO Energy Inc., * Opinion by Williams, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court to the extent that it found the Dedicated Acreage map was unenforceable in toto under the statute of frauds, and to the extent that the trial court’s judgment ordered Appellant take nothing on its claims for breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, fraud and string along fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit. In all other aspects, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

ETC Texas Pipeline, Ltd. v. XTO Energy Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etc-texas-pipeline-ltd-v-xto-energy-inc-texapp-2024.