E&T Ventures, Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Euphoria Wellness, Llc)

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 10, 2022
Docket84133
StatusPublished

This text of E&T Ventures, Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Euphoria Wellness, Llc) (E&T Ventures, Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Euphoria Wellness, Llc)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E&T Ventures, Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Euphoria Wellness, Llc), (Neb. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

E&T VENTURES, LLC, No. 84133 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE FILE JOANNA KISHNER, DISTRICT FEB 1 0 2022 JUDGE, A. BROWN UPREME COURT Respondents, DEP TY CLERK and EUPHORIA WELLNESS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order setting an evidentiary hearing to determine discovery sanctions, directing the nonparty who verified interrogatory responses on behalf of petitioner to appear, and directing counsel for petitioner to serve the order on the nonparty. Having considered the petition and supporting documentation, we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

on 1947A 47/Y. .61 Z 2-09 s32- relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED)

Acz_A velk J. Hardesty

Stiglich

Herndon

cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge Law Office of Mitchell Stipp Jones Lovelock Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of this order, petitioner's emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
E&T Ventures, Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Euphoria Wellness, Llc), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/et-ventures-llc-v-dist-ct-euphoria-wellness-llc-nev-2022.