Et MacKenzie Company v. Long Investment Company, Ltd.
740 N.W.2d 258, 2007 WL 3146558
Opinion
E.T. MACKENZIE COMPANY and Keystone Design Group, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
LONG INVESTMENT COMPANY, LTD., Long Investment Company, L.L.C., Long Investment, Inc., NBD Bank Corporation, Equity Funding, Inc., Soil & Materials Engineers, Inc., GE Appliances Division, General Electric Company, Mid-America Tile, Inc., Lansing Clarion Limited Partnership, Michael D. Dudley, Robert C. Lecy, Gregory E. Mayville, James A. Jarvis, Ann O. Jarvis, Margaret E. Jacobs, Michael Panek, Gordon L. Long, Lillian G. Long, and Anthony A. Paradise Trust & Executive Commons, L.L.C., Defendants, and
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, and
Russell Hinkle, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 26, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Et MacKenzie Company v. Long Investment Company, Ltd., 740 N.W.2d 258, 2007 WL 3146558 (Mich. 2007).
740 N.W.2d 258 (Et MacKenzie Company v. Long Investment Company, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Smith
740 N.W.2d 258 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)