Et MacKenzie Co. v. Long Inv. Co., Ltd.
740 N.W.2d 257, 480 Mich. 926
This text of 740 N.W.2d 257 (Et MacKenzie Co. v. Long Inv. Co., Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Et MacKenzie Co. v. Long Inv. Co., Ltd., 740 N.W.2d 257, 480 Mich. 926 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
E.T. MACKENZIE COMPANY and Keystone Design Group, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
LONG INVESTMENT COMPANY, LTD., Long Investment Company, L.L.C., Long Investment, Inc., NBD Bank Corporation, Equity Funding, Inc., Soil & Materials Engineers, Inc., GE Appliances Division, General Electric Company, Mid-America Tile, Inc., Lansing Clarion Limited Partnership, Michael D. Dudley, Robert C. Lecy, Gregory E. Mayville, James A. Jarvis, Ann O. Jarvis, Margaret E. Jacobs, Michael Panek, Gordon L. Long, Lillian G. Long, and Anthony A. Paradise Trust & Executive Commons, L.L.C., Defendants, and
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and
Russell Hinkle, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 26, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, *258 and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
740 N.W.2d 257, 480 Mich. 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/et-mackenzie-co-v-long-inv-co-ltd-mich-2007.