ET 8 LP TRANSCENDENT ELECTRA MANAGEMENT LLC v. GORDON

M.D. Georgia

ET 8 LP TRANSCENDENT ELECTRA MANAGEMENT LLC v. GORDON

District Court, M.D. Georgia·Decided July 20, 2023·No. 5:23-cv-00196·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

ET 8 LP TRANSCENDENT ELECTRA ) MANAGEMENT, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-cv-196 (MTT) v. ) ) WILLIAM HAYWOOD GORDON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________ )

ORDER Defendant William Gordon removed this action on June 5, 2023. Doc. 1. Because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, this case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Houston County, Georgia. District courts “may remand a case sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time.” Corp. Mgmt. Advisors, Inc. v. Artjen Complexus, Inc., 561 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)). On June 13, 2023, the Court ordered Gordon to show cause why this case should not be remanded for lack of jurisdiction. Doc. 2. Gordon responded, and asserts the Court has subject matter jurisdiction because the case “present[s] federal questions under the” Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and the United States Constitution. Doc. 3 at 3-4. Gordon has failed to demonstrate that the Court has federal question jurisdiction. Plaintiff ET 8 LP Transcendent Electra Management, LLC filed a petition for writ of possession against Gordon—a state law issue. Doc. 1-2 at 1. Thus, if anything, and as Gordon indicates, the FDCPA and the Constitution may be the source of his “counterclaims”—but 28 U.S.C. Section 1441 “does not permit removal based on counterclaims at all.” Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, __ U.S. __, 139 S.Ct. 1743, 1748 (2019). Gordon does not assert that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction based on

diversity. Nor could he. Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1441(b)(2), “[a] civil action otherwise removable solely on the basis of jurisdiction . . . may not be removed if any of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.” Gordon is a Georgia resident and ET 8 LP brought an action in a Georgia state court against him. Docs. 1; 1-1. Therefore, removal based on diversity is also improper. Because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, this action is REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Houston County, Georgia. SO ORDERED, this 20th day of July, 2023. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

ET 8 LP TRANSCENDENT ELECTRA ) MANAGEMENT, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-cv-196 (MTT) v. ) ) WILLIAM HAYWOOD GORDON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________ )

ORDER Defendant William Gordon removed this action on June 5, 2023. Doc. 1. Because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, this case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Houston County, Georgia. District courts “may remand a case sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time.” Corp. Mgmt. Advisors, Inc. v. Artjen Complexus, Inc., 561 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)). On June 13, 2023, the Court ordered Gordon to show cause why this case should not be remanded for lack of jurisdiction. Doc. 2. Gordon responded, and asserts the Court has subject matter jurisdiction because the case “present[s] federal questions under the” Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and the United States Constitution. Doc. 3 at 3-4. Gordon has failed to demonstrate that the Court has federal question jurisdiction. Plaintiff ET 8 LP Transcendent Electra Management, LLC filed a petition for writ of possession against Gordon—a state law issue. Doc. 1-2 at 1. Thus, if anything, and as Gordon indicates, the FDCPA and the Constitution may be the source of his “counterclaims”—but 28 U.S.C. Section 1441 “does not permit removal based on counterclaims at all.” Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, __ U.S. __, 139 S.Ct. 1743, 1748 (2019). Gordon does not assert that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction based on

diversity. Nor could he. Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1441(b)(2), “[a] civil action otherwise removable solely on the basis of jurisdiction . . . may not be removed if any of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.” Gordon is a Georgia resident and ET 8 LP brought an action in a Georgia state court against him. Docs. 1; 1-1. Therefore, removal based on diversity is also improper. Because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, this action is REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Houston County, Georgia. SO ORDERED, this 20th day of July, 2023. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ET 8 LP TRANSCENDENT ELECTRA MANAGEMENT LLC v. GORDON, (M.D. Ga. 2023).

Pincite

ET 8 LP TRANSCENDENT ELECTRA MANAGEMENT LLC v. GORDON (ET 8 LP TRANSCENDENT ELECTRA MANAGEMENT LLC v. GORDON) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related