Esurance Insurance Services, Inc. v. Ramsey

S.D. Illinois

Esurance Insurance Services, Inc. v. Ramsey

DecidedJanuary 3, 2023

Docket3:20-cv-01378-RJD-DWD

StatusUnknown

This text of Esurance Insurance Services, Inc. v. Ramsey (Esurance Insurance Services, Inc. v. Ramsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Esurance Insurance Services, Inc. v. Ramsey, (S.D. Ill. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ESURANCE INSURANCE SERVICES, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Case No. 3:20-cv-1378-RJD-DWD LAJAVION RAMSEY, ALEXIS N. ) HILL, TERRI ARNETT, DONALD ) ARNETT, DA-MON L. PERKINS, ) TERRION CARTER-SMITH, FAITH ) STUBBLEFIELD, NICHOLAS A. ) SMITH, and WILLIAM R. RANKIN, )

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DUGAN, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly (Doc. 74) on whether the Court should grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (“Motion”) (Doc. 73). Not all parties have entered their appearance and consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, requiring the present Memorandum & Order. (Doc. 74, pg. 1). The Report and Recommendation, entered on December 12, 2022, recommends that the Motion be granted and declaratory judgment be entered for Plaintiff. (Doc. 74, pg. 1). It is further recommended that the Court adopt the finds of fact and conclusions of law of Magistrate Judge Daly. (Doc. 74, pg. 1). There is no objection to the Report and Recommendation. Where neither timely nor specific objections are made, the Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); accord Strickland v. Godinez, 104 F. Supp. 3d 940, 941 (S.D. Ill. 2015). The Court may then “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the

magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The undersigned has reviewed Magistrate Judge Daly’s Report and Recommendation and finds that there is no clear error in her findings of fact or conclusions of law. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 74) is ADOPTED in whole and the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a declaratory default judgment against Defendants.

SO ORDERED. Dated: January 3, 2023. s/ David W. Dugan ______________________________ DAVID W. DUGAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ESURANCE INSURANCE SERVICES, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Case No. 3:20-cv-1378-RJD-DWD LAJAVION RAMSEY, ALEXIS N. ) HILL, TERRI ARNETT, DONALD ) ARNETT, DA-MON L. PERKINS, ) TERRION CARTER-SMITH, FAITH ) STUBBLEFIELD, NICHOLAS A. ) SMITH, and WILLIAM R. RANKIN, )

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DUGAN, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly (Doc. 74) on whether the Court should grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (“Motion”) (Doc. 73). Not all parties have entered their appearance and consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, requiring the present Memorandum & Order. (Doc. 74, pg. 1). The Report and Recommendation, entered on December 12, 2022, recommends that the Motion be granted and declaratory judgment be entered for Plaintiff. (Doc. 74, pg. 1). It is further recommended that the Court adopt the finds of fact and conclusions of law of Magistrate Judge Daly. (Doc. 74, pg. 1). There is no objection to the Report and Recommendation. Where neither timely nor specific objections are made, the Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); accord Strickland v. Godinez, 104 F. Supp. 3d 940, 941 (S.D. Ill. 2015). The Court may then “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the

magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The undersigned has reviewed Magistrate Judge Daly’s Report and Recommendation and finds that there is no clear error in her findings of fact or conclusions of law. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 74) is ADOPTED in whole and the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a declaratory default judgment against Defendants.

SO ORDERED. Dated: January 3, 2023. s/ David W. Dugan ______________________________ DAVID W. DUGAN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Esurance Insurance Services, Inc. v. Ramsey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esurance-insurance-services-inc-v-ramsey-ilsd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack