Estruch v. Volkswagenwerk, AG.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Estruch v. Volkswagenwerk, AG.

97 A.D.2d 978, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20824

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1983

DocketAppeal No. 3

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 97 A.D.2d 978 (Estruch v. Volkswagenwerk, AG.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Estruch v. Volkswagenwerk, AG., 97 A.D.2d 978, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Inasmuch as the individual claims for damages under subdivision (h) of section 349 and subdivision 3 of section 350-d of the General Business Law have been found to be without merit plaintiffs may not, as representatives, maintain a class action based on those sections (see CPLR 901, subd a, par 3; McLaughlin, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C901:4; Kindel v Kaufman & Broad Homes, 67 AD2d 938; Rapp v Dime Sav. Bank, 64 AD2d 964, affd 48 NY2d 658); thus, the class causes of action were properly dismissed. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J. — summary judgment.) Present ■— Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Inasmuch as the individual claims for damages under subdivision (h) of section 349 and subdivision 3 of section 350-d of the General Business Law have been found to be without merit plaintiffs may not, as representatives, maintain a class action based on those sections (see CPLR 901, subd a, par 3; McLaughlin, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C901:4; Kindel v Kaufman & Broad Homes, 67 AD2d 938; Rapp v Dime Sav. Bank, 64 AD2d 964, affd 48 NY2d 658); thus, the class causes of action were properly dismissed. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J. — summary judgment.) Present ■— Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.2d 978, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estruch-v-volkswagenwerk-ag-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack