Estroff v. Kaplin

126 S.E. 159, 33 Ga. App. 374, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 781
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 17, 1925
Docket15326
StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 159 (Estroff v. Kaplin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estroff v. Kaplin, 126 S.E. 159, 33 Ga. App. 374, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 781 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

A process beginning “State of Georgia, Toombs and Treutlen counties: To the sheriff of said county—Greetings:” contains a direction to the sheriff of Treutlen county, Georgia; and where such process is regularly issued and is attached to a second original of a suit brought in the superior court of Toombs county, Georgia, service of the petition and process may legally be perfected in'Treutlen county by the sheriff of that county. See, in' this connection, Civil Code (1910), § 5567. The affidavit of illegality was properly dismissed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, B. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 159, 33 Ga. App. 374, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estroff-v-kaplin-gactapp-1925.