Estroff v. Gillis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Estroff v. Gillis

126 S.E. 304, 33 Ga. App. 354, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 766

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1925

Docket15979

StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 304 (Estroff v. Gillis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Estroff v. Gillis, 126 S.E. 304, 33 Ga. App. 354, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 766 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under all the particular facts of the case, and the rulings of this court when it was here before (31 Ga. App. 501, 121 S. E. 339), it can not be held as a matter of law that the trial judge abused his discretion in granting a new trial, although it was the second grant thereof to the same party, and the motion for a new trial was based upon the usual general grounds only; the first new trial being granted because of an erroneous charge by the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

Under all the particular facts of the case, and the rulings of this court when it was here before (31 Ga. App. 501, 121 S. E. 339), it can not be held as a matter of law that the trial judge abused his discretion in granting a new trial, although it was the second grant thereof to the same party, and the motion for a new trial was based upon the usual general grounds only; the first new trial being granted because of an erroneous charge by the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 S.E. 304, 33 Ga. App. 354, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estroff-v-gillis-gactapp-1925.