Estrella v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

22 F. App'x 347
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 2002
DocketNo. 01-1919
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 22 F. App'x 347 (Estrella v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estrella v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 22 F. App'x 347 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Teofista Estrella petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her application for asylum. Estrella claims the evidence was sufficient to prove her persecutor’s mixed motive, her well-founded fear of persecution on account of her political opinion, and that she did not have an option of internal relocation. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings that Estrella failed to establish that her fear and the incidents of extortion were related to her political opinion and that she failed to demonstrate her inability to relocate within the Philippines. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (West 1999); Huaman-Cornelio v. Board of Immigration Appeals, 979 F.2d 995 (4th Cir.1992). We accordingly affirm the Board’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. United States of America
D. South Carolina, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F. App'x 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estrella-v-us-immigration-naturalization-service-ca4-2002.