Estrella v. New York City Transit Authority

6 A.D.3d 305, 775 N.Y.S.2d 139, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4781
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 2004·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[306]*306Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered June 16, 2003, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint to add a cause of action under General Municipal Law § 205-e, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly granted upon a record showing that the facts underlying the amendment were made known to defendant-appellant at an early stage of the action, and where the amendment seeks only to add a new theory of liability based on those facts (see Falk v National Union Fire Ins. Co., 249 AD2d 238 [1998]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estrella v. New York City Transit Authority, 6 A.D.3d 305, 775 N.Y.S.2d 139, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

6 A.D.3d 305 (Estrella v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. Liberty Lines Tr., Inc.
2020 NY Slip Op 06005 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
M.A. Angeliades, Inc. v. Hill International, Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 4216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)