Estrada v. State
82 So. 3d 976, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12476, 2011 WL 3477025
Opinion
Affirmed. See Dowe v. State, 39 So.3d 407, 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“[W]e find that the trial court’s use of the erroneous manslaughter instruction was not fundamental error because the instruction gave the jury two options on the crime’s second element: either that the defendant ‘intentionally caused the death’ of the victim, or that the death of the victim ‘was caused by the culpable negligence’ of the defendant.”); Singh v. State, 36 So.3d 848, 849-51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (same).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estrada v. State, 82 So. 3d 976, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12476, 2011 WL 3477025 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
82 So. 3d 976 (Estrada v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Singh v. State
36 So. 3d 848 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Dowe v. State
39 So. 3d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)