Estrada v. State
954 So. 2d 639, 2007 WL 674690
Opinion
Gonzalo ESTRADA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Gonzalo Estrada, Florida City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Spera v. State, 923 So.2d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
STONE, POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION TO CERTIFY CONFLICT
PER CURIAM.
We deny appellant's motion for rehearing but grant his motion to certify conflict. As our affirmance was based in part on Spera v. State, 923 So.2d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), as we did in Spera, we certify conflict with Keevis v. State, 908 So.2d 552 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
STONE, POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estrada v. State, 954 So. 2d 639, 2007 WL 674690 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
954 So. 2d 639 (Estrada v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estrada v. State
980 So. 2d 1053 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)