Estrada v. State

689 So. 2d 372, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1398, 1997 WL 71744
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 1997
DocketNo. 95-02660
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 689 So. 2d 372 (Estrada v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estrada v. State, 689 So. 2d 372, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1398, 1997 WL 71744 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Paleno Estrada, challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery. After a review of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the defendant’s conviction. We strike, however, that portion of probation condition 9 requiring Mr. Estrada to pay for random drug and alcohol testing because it is a special condition that was not orally announced at sentencing. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We affirm the sentence in all other respects.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartley v. State
689 So. 2d 372 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
689 So. 2d 372, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1398, 1997 WL 71744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estrada-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.