Estrada v. State
This text of 689 So. 2d 372 (Estrada v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, Paleno Estrada, challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery. After a review of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the defendant’s conviction. We strike, however, that portion of probation condition 9 requiring Mr. Estrada to pay for random drug and alcohol testing because it is a special condition that was not orally announced at sentencing. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We affirm the sentence in all other respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 So. 2d 372, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1398, 1997 WL 71744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estrada-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.