Estrada v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Estrada v. State

619 So. 2d 1057, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6756, 1993 WL 221416

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 1993

DocketNo. 92-02576

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 619 So. 2d 1057 (Estrada v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Estrada v. State, 619 So. 2d 1057, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6756, 1993 WL 221416 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Miguel Angel Estrada, challenges certain conditions of his probation and the imposition of certain costs. We affirm.

We write only to explain that the conditions concerning alcohol use and testing do not violate Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993) because they were related to the offense for which appellant was convicted. The record reveals that appellant told police that he committed the offense because he was intoxicated.

We find no error in the other challenged condition and the imposition of costs and, accordingly, affirm.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI