Estrada v. Rhode Island

594 F.3d 56
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Estrada v. Rhode Island. Read the opinion of the Court — 594 F.3d 56
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided February 22, 2010·No. 09-1149·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 09-1149

ASTRID G. ESTRADA; WENDY M. ESTRADA; GUILFREDO E. MUÑOZ; JOSÉ A. AQUINO; CRUZ F. RIVERA; CARLOS E. TAMUP; JOSÉ BURGOS; ABELINO M. URIZAR; ISRAEL TEBALAN; ROLANDO NORIEGA; BORIS CRUZ; ELSA HERNÁNDEZ VILAVICENCIO,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, State Police Department; STEVEN M. PARE, individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Rhode Island State Police; C. THOMAS CHABOT, individually and in his official capacity as a state trooper employed by the State of Rhode Island,

Defendants, Appellees,

JANE DOE, individually and in her official capacity as a state trooper employed by the State of Rhode Island,

Defendant.

ERRATA SHEET

Chief Judge Lynch's concurrence in the opinion of this Court issued on February 4, 2010 is amended as follows:

On page 28, line 3, "I do not rely on it" should be replaced with "I do not rely on them"

On page 28, line 4, "because the admission is not contained" should be replaced with "because the admissions are not contained"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estrada v. Rhode Island, 594 F.3d 56 (1st Cir. 2010).

594 F.3d 56 (Estrada v. Rhode Island) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.