Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey. Read the opinion of the Court — 546 F.3d 1147
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2008·No. 05-75850·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN ELIAS ESTRADA-ESPINOZA,  Petitioner, No. 05-75850 v.  Agency No. A76-339-422 MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed May 6, 2008

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

5249 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey, (9th Cir. 2008).

Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey (Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.