Estopinan v. Estopinan
870 So. 2d 183, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2136, 2004 WL 363468
This text of 870 So. 2d 183 (Estopinan v. Estopinan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Estopinan v. Estopinan, 870 So. 2d 183, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2136, 2004 WL 363468 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinions
With the exception of the award of $11,337.52 in lump sum alimony, which the parties agree was erroneously entered because of a mathematical mistake and must be deleted, no abuse of discretion has been demonstrated in the final judgment of dissolution on appeal, and it is therefore otherwise affirmed.
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Reynolds v. Reynolds
615 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Gil v. Mendelson
793 So. 2d 1061 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Hamlet v. Hamlet
583 So. 2d 654 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
870 So. 2d 183, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2136, 2004 WL 363468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estopinan-v-estopinan-fladistctapp-2004.