Estopinan v. Estopinan
870 So. 2d 183, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2136, 2004 WL 363468
Opinions
With the exception of the award of $11,337.52 in lump sum alimony, which the parties agree was erroneously entered because of a mathematical mistake and must be deleted, no abuse of discretion has been demonstrated in the final judgment of dissolution on appeal, and it is therefore otherwise affirmed.
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estopinan v. Estopinan, 870 So. 2d 183, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2136, 2004 WL 363468 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
870 So. 2d 183 (Estopinan v. Estopinan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reynolds v. Reynolds
615 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Gil v. Mendelson
793 So. 2d 1061 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Hamlet v. Hamlet
583 So. 2d 654 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)