Estis v. Ambar Lone Star Fluid Service
100 So. 3d 351, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 207, 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1261, 2012 WL 4774878
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Estis v. Ambar Lone Star Fluid Service. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 206 →
Opinion
IjFor the reasons assigned in the similarly captioned consolidated case designated as Number 12-206, Dustin Estis v. Ambar Lone Star Fluid Service, 12-206 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/3/12), 100 So.3d 348, the judgment of the workers’ compensation judge is affirmed as amended. All costs of these proceedings are taxed to Ambar Lone Star Fluid Service.
AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estis v. Ambar Lone Star Fluid Service, 100 So. 3d 351, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 207, 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1261, 2012 WL 4774878 (La. Ct. App. 2012).
100 So. 3d 351 (Estis v. Ambar Lone Star Fluid Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estis v. Ambar Lone Star Fluid Service
100 So. 3d 348 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
Ferry v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd.
124 So. 848 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1929)