Estime v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Estime v. State

826 So. 2d 524, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13978, 2002 WL 31115533

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 25, 2002

DocketNo. 4D02-730

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 826 So. 2d 524 (Estime v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Estime v. State, 826 So. 2d 524, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13978, 2002 WL 31115533 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to file a sworn, legally sufficient motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42, 47 (Fla.2000); Orduno v. State, 800 So.2d 669, 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)(“[Orduno] asserted that the trial court did not advise him of the deportation consequences of his plea as required under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172, that he did not know he could be deported if he pleaded no contest, and that he would not have entered the plea if he had known he could be deported. Orduno has stated a facially sufficient claim for relief’).

GUNTHER, FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to file a sworn, legally sufficient motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42, 47 (Fla.2000); Orduno v. State, 800 So.2d 669, 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)(“[Orduno] asserted that the trial court did not advise him of the deportation consequences of his plea as required under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172, that he did not know he could be deported if he pleaded no contest, and that he would not have entered the plea if he had known he could be deported. Orduno has stated a facially sufficient claim for relief’).

GUNTHER, FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

826 So. 2d 524, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13978, 2002 WL 31115533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estime-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack