Estill v. Shelley

2 Port. 185
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1835·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By Mr. Justice Hitchcock :

This is an action of trespass, vi et armis, for taking and carrying off a slave, the property of the plaintiff. The declaration is in the common form, but [186] the blanks, as to the time of committing of the alleged trespass, are not filled up; for this, there is a general demurrer. This defect is cured by the sta^ tute of amendments, which considers all such defects as amended.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estill v. Shelley, 2 Port. 185 (Ala. 1835).

2 Port. 185 (Estill v. Shelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nesbit v. Bradford
6 Ala. 746 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1844)