Estill v. Shelley
2 Port. 185
Opinion
This is an action of trespass, vi et armis, for taking and carrying off a slave, the property of the plaintiff. The declaration is in the common form, but [186] the blanks, as to the time of committing of the alleged trespass, are not filled up; for this, there is a general demurrer. This defect is cured by the sta^ tute of amendments, which considers all such defects as amended.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estill v. Shelley, 2 Port. 185 (Ala. 1835).
2 Port. 185 (Estill v. Shelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nesbit v. Bradford
6 Ala. 746 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1844)