Esther Thompson v. Francis Keeling

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 6, 2020
Docket05-19-01469-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Esther Thompson v. Francis Keeling (Esther Thompson v. Francis Keeling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Esther Thompson v. Francis Keeling, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Vacate and Render and Opinion Filed January 6, 2020

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01469-CV

ESTHER THOMPSON, Appellant V. FRANCIS KEELING, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-04386

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Pedersen, III Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Before the Court is the parties’ December 20, 2019 joint motion to dismiss. The motion

states the parties have reached an agreement and details the same. We grant the motion, vacate

the trial court’s judgment, and render judgment, as set out in the parties’ motion, as follows:

1. Appellant agrees to pay to Appellee the total sum of $30,000, in exchange for Appellee’s pro rata share of the real property located at 723 Calcutta Drive Dallas Texas 75241, and more fully described as: Lot 4, Block 1/6017, of the Glenview Addition No. 6 an Addition to the City of Dallas, Texas. According to the Map thereof recorded in Volume 29, Page 79, Map Records, Dallas, Texas - commonly known as 723 Calcutta Drive, Dallas, Texas 75241.

2. Appellee agrees to convey deed to Appellant via Special Warranty Deed, her interest in the real property described above, commonly known as 723 Calcutta Drive Dallas Texas 75241, and more fully described as: Lot 4, Block 1/6017, of the Glenview Addition No. 6 an Addition to the City of Dallas, Texas. According to the Map thereof recorded in Volume 29, Page 79, Map Records, Dallas, Texas. Reservations from and Acceptance to Conveyance: NONE, immediately upon payment by Appellant, in the sum of $30,000. The deed shall be drafted by Appellant’s attorney and provided to Appellee to sign. Appellant shall incur the costs of recording the deed.

Attorney’s fees and costs of court shall be taxed against the party incurring the same. All

other claims or matters in this cause are dismissed with prejudice.

/Bill Pedersen, III// BILL PEDERSEN. III JUSTICE

191469f.p05 Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

ESTHER THOMPSON, Appellant On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-19-01469-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-04386. Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III. FRANCIS KEELING, Appellee Justices Osborne and Partida-Kipness participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the parties’ joint motion, VACATE the trial court’s judgment, and RENDER judgment, as set out in the parties’ motion, as follows:

Appellant agrees to pay to Appellee the total sum of $30,000, in exchange for Appellee’s pro rata share of the real property located at 723 Calcutta Drive Dallas Texas 75241, and more fully described as: Lot 4, Block 1/6017, of the Glenview Addition No. 6 an Addition to the City of Dallas, Texas. According to the Map thereof recorded in Volume 29, Page 79, Map Records, Dallas, Texas - commonly known as 723 Calcutta Drive, Dallas, Texas 75241.

Appellee agrees to convey deed to Appellant via Special Warranty Deed, her interest in the real property described above, commonly known as 723 Calcutta Drive Dallas Texas 75241, and more fully described as: Lot 4, Block 1/6017, of the Glenview Addition No. 6 an Addition to the City of Dallas, Texas. According to the Map thereof recorded in Volume 29, Page 79, Map Records, Dallas, Texas. Reservations from and Acceptance to Conveyance: NONE, immediately upon payment by Appellant, in the sum of $30,000. The deed shall be drafted by Appellant’s attorney and provided to Appellee to sign. Appellant shall incur the costs of recording the deed.

Attorney’s fees and costs of court shall be taxed against the party incurring the same. All other claims or matters in this cause are dismissed with prejudice.

Judgment entered this 6th day of January, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Esther Thompson v. Francis Keeling, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esther-thompson-v-francis-keeling-texapp-2020.