Esther Portillo v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

432 F. App'x 682
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 10, 2011·No. 09-70334·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Esther Portillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s order pretermitting her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Mercado-Zazueta v. Holder, 580 F.3d 1102, 1104 (9th Cir.2009), and we grant the petition for review.

The BIA decided this case without the benefit of our decision in Mercado-Zazueta v. Holder, in which we held that for purposes of satisfying the five years of lawful permanent residence required under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(1), a parent’s status as a lawful permanent resident is imputed to the unemancipated minor children residing with that parent. 580 F.3d at 1113-16. Accordingly, we grant the petition for review and remand to the BIA for further proceedings. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Esther Portillo v. Eric H. Holder Jr., 432 F. App'x 682 (9th Cir. 2011).

432 F. App'x 682 (Esther Portillo v. Eric H. Holder Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura
537 U.S. 12 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Mercado-Zazueta v. Holder
580 F.3d 1102 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)