Esthay, Kirt Allen
This text of Esthay, Kirt Allen (Esthay, Kirt Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-85,164-02
IN RE KIRT ALLEN ESTHAY, Relator
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. DAS-13-01849 IN THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT FROM CONCHO COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original
jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus
in the 119th District Court of Concho County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the
application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.
In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Concho
County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas
corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order that designates issues to be investigated
(see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that Relator has 2
not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Concho County. Should the response include
an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was served with the habeas
application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to file a writ of
mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such
response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.
Filed: August 24, 2016 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Esthay, Kirt Allen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esthay-kirt-allen-texcrimapp-2016.