Estey v. State

751 So. 2d 194, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1687, 2000 WL 201312
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 2000·No. Nos. 4D98-1850, 4D98-2336·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions on three counts of sexual battery on a child under the age of 12 and the resulting life sentences. As to count II, however, we reverse the conviction. There was insufficient evidence to show the commission of a sexual battery during the period encompassed by count II. The grounds for our reversal as to count II necessarily preclude any retrial on this charge.

FARMER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estey v. State, 751 So. 2d 194, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1687, 2000 WL 201312 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

751 So. 2d 194 (Estey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramos v. State
75 So. 3d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Gamble v. State
870 So. 2d 110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)