Estey v. State

751 So. 2d 194, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1687, 2000 WL 201312
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 23, 2000
DocketNos. 4D98-1850, 4D98-2336
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 751 So. 2d 194 (Estey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estey v. State, 751 So. 2d 194, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1687, 2000 WL 201312 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions on three counts of sexual battery on a child under the age of 12 and the resulting life sentences. As to count II, however, we reverse the conviction. There was insufficient evidence to show the commission of a sexual battery during the period encompassed by count II. The grounds for our reversal as to count II necessarily preclude any retrial on this charge.

FARMER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramos v. State
75 So. 3d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Gamble v. State
870 So. 2d 110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
751 So. 2d 194, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1687, 2000 WL 201312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estey-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.