Estevez v. Project Advisors Group, Ltd.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Estevez v. Project Advisors Group, Ltd.

564 So. 2d 198, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4727, 1990 WL 94148

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 3, 1990·No. No. 89-2963·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court was correct in determining that a Florida limited partnership, which was in the business of operating a residential facility in Kentucky, had not been “dissolved” when it temporarily lost its authority to transact business in Florida under the provisions of section 620.178, Florida Statutes (1985). This court will not consider other issues urged as grounds for reversal in view of the fact that the trial court was not afforded a full and adequate opportunity to consider those matters. See Walker v. Hampton, 235 So.2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Paul v. Kanter, 155 So.2d 402 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court in all respects.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court was correct in determining that a Florida limited partnership, which was in the business of operating a residential facility in Kentucky, had not been “dissolved” when it temporarily lost its authority to transact business in Florida under the provisions of section 620.178, Florida Statutes (1985). This court will not consider other issues urged as grounds for reversal in view of the fact that the trial court was not afforded a full and adequate opportunity to consider those matters. See Walker v. Hampton, 235 So.2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Paul v. Kanter, 155 So.2d 402 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court in all respects.

Affirmed.

Estevez v. Project Advisors Group, Ltd., 564 So. 2d 198, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4727, 1990 WL 94148 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

564 So. 2d 198 (Estevez v. Project Advisors Group, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related