Estevez v. Estevez
This text of 165 So. 3d 807 (Estevez v. Estevez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner Ramon Estevez (Husband) seeks this Court’s certiorari review of an order of the trial court denying Huband’s Motion for Protective Order directed toward discovery propounded on Husband by Respondent Ileana Estevez n/k/a Ileana Perez (Wife).
The trial court entered judgment in favor of the Wife in the amount of $868,867, representing payments Husband owed to Wife pursuant to their dissolution of marriage in 2000. After the trial court entered its judgment, Wife served a Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum in Aid of Execution, from which Husband sought protection.
In his petition for writ of certiorari, Husband alleges that Wife’s proposed discovery is onerous, burdensome, harassing, and irrelevant. While we might entertain some doubt about so broad a scope of discovery, we cannot say the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law, causing irreparable injury, so as to warrant certiorari relief. Bd. of Trs. of Internal Improvement Trust Fund v. Am. Educ. Enters., LLC, 99 So.3d 450, 456-57 (Fla.2012).
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 So. 3d 807, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7994, 2015 WL 3397620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estevez-v-estevez-fladistctapp-2015.