Esteve Bros. & Co. v. Rosengrant

73 S.E. 534, 10 Ga. App. 286, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 462
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1912
Docket3370
StatusPublished

This text of 73 S.E. 534 (Esteve Bros. & Co. v. Rosengrant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Esteve Bros. & Co. v. Rosengrant, 73 S.E. 534, 10 Ga. App. 286, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 462 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. A bill of sale to staves, stating the number sold, where located, their length, and the number of staves of each length, and that 44 per cent, were made of red oak, and that all .were to be shipped from the place where located to designated consignees, was not void for uncertainty in its description of the property. This description .pointed out with sufficient definiteness and certainty the property sold, and any deficiencies as to identity could be supplied by parol. Thomas Lumber Co. v. T. & C. Furniture Co., 120 Ga. 879; Beaty v. Sears, 132 Ga. 516; tiedeman on Sales, § 233.

2. No error of law appears, and the evidence fully supports the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A. S. Thomas Furniture Co. v. T. & C. Furniture Co.
48 S.E. 333 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Beaty v. Sears
64 S.E. 321 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 534, 10 Ga. App. 286, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esteve-bros-co-v-rosengrant-gactapp-1912.