Estes v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Estes v. State

190 So. 485, 139 Fla. 141, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1637

DecidedJuly 7, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 485 (Estes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Estes v. State, 190 So. 485, 139 Fla. 141, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1637 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings here for review judgment of conviction of the offense of the larceny of a bull.

The plaintiff in error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

The evidence was ample to establish every element of the offense charged and no reversible error is found in the record.

Therefore, the judgment should be, and is, affirmed.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J.,' concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment: Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI