Estes v. Rockinson

461 So. 2d 989, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16268
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 1984·No. No. AZ-178·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment on the pleadings entered by the trial court is affirmed. In affirming the judgment, we hold that a dental hygienist, when cleaning teeth, is a provider of health care within the meaning of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estes v. Rockinson, 461 So. 2d 989, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16268 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

461 So. 2d 989 (Estes v. Rockinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shields v. Buchholz
515 So. 2d 1379 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)