Estes v. Rockinson

461 So. 2d 989, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16268
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 17, 1984
DocketNo. AZ-178
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 461 So. 2d 989 (Estes v. Rockinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estes v. Rockinson, 461 So. 2d 989, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16268 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment on the pleadings entered by the trial court is affirmed. In affirming the judgment, we hold that a dental hygienist, when cleaning teeth, is a provider of health care within the meaning of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shields v. Buchholz
515 So. 2d 1379 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
461 So. 2d 989, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estes-v-rockinson-fladistctapp-1984.