Estes v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Estes v. Richardson

331 S.W.2d 285

DecidedJanuary 22, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 331 S.W.2d 285 (Estes v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Estes v. Richardson, 331 S.W.2d 285 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for appeal from a judgment for the defendant, entered on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict for $1,000 returned in favor of the plaintiff by the jury.

The plaintiff’s finger was cut off by a saw in an edger where he was working. His proof failed to show negligence on the part of the defendant, and established that the accident was caused by his own negligence. On the law and the facts, we find nothing in this record to justify reversal of the judgment.

The motion for appeal is denied, arid the judgment stands affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for appeal from a judgment for the defendant, entered on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict for $1,000 returned in favor of the plaintiff by the jury.

The plaintiff’s finger was cut off by a saw in an edger where he was working. His proof failed to show negligence on the part of the defendant, and established that the accident was caused by his own negligence. On the law and the facts, we find nothing in this record to justify reversal of the judgment.

The motion for appeal is denied, arid the judgment stands affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 S.W.2d 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estes-v-richardson-kyctapp-1960.