Estes v. Pioneer Bonding & Insurance Agency, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Estes v. Pioneer Bonding & Insurance Agency, Inc.

567 So. 2d 44, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7293, 1990 WL 138399

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 26, 1990

DocketNo. 90-1081

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 567 So. 2d 44 (Estes v. Pioneer Bonding & Insurance Agency, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Estes v. Pioneer Bonding & Insurance Agency, Inc., 567 So. 2d 44, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7293, 1990 WL 138399 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the motion to transfer venue is affirmed. The plaintiff was suing on a settlement agreement over a promissory note executed by defendant to plaintiff. As part of that settlement agreement, defendant agreed to make some payments to plaintiffs principal shareholder in North Carolina. However, the agreement provided that if defendant failed to make those payments, the entire amount of the promissory note would become due and payable to plaintiff and not to the shareholder in North Carolina. Plaintiff’s principal place of business is in Palm Beach County, and the promissory note specifies for payment there. Thus, the general rule that in agreements for payment of money the action accrues where payment is to be made applies, Davis v. Dempsey, 343 So.2d 950 (Fla.3d DCA 1977), or if no place of payment is specified in the county where the creditor resides as the debtor must seek out the creditor for payment. Borkson, Simon & Moskowitz, P.A. v. Troutman, 534 So.2d 928 (Fla.4th DCA 1988). In both cases that county is Palm Beach County.

Affirmed.

DELL, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the motion to transfer venue is affirmed. The plaintiff was suing on a settlement agreement over a promissory note executed by defendant to plaintiff. As part of that settlement agreement, defendant agreed to make some payments to plaintiffs principal shareholder in North Carolina. However, the agreement provided that if defendant failed to make those payments, the entire amount of the promissory note would become due and payable to plaintiff and not to the shareholder in North Carolina. Plaintiff’s principal place of business is in Palm Beach County, and the promissory note specifies for payment there. Thus, the general rule that in agreements for payment of money the action accrues where payment is to be made applies, Davis v. Dempsey, 343 So.2d 950 (Fla.3d DCA 1977), or if no place of payment is specified in the county where the creditor resides as the debtor must seek out the creditor for payment. Borkson, Simon & Moskowitz, P.A. v. Troutman, 534 So.2d 928 (Fla.4th DCA 1988). In both cases that county is Palm Beach County.

Affirmed.

DELL, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 So. 2d 44, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7293, 1990 WL 138399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estes-v-pioneer-bonding-insurance-agency-inc-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack