Estes v. Estes

373 So. 2d 965, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15407
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 16, 1979
DocketNo. MM-58
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 373 So. 2d 965 (Estes v. Estes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estes v. Estes, 373 So. 2d 965, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15407 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although both counsel were at fault in not filing financial affidavits of their clients before the scheduled hearing on child support, the record as reconstituted shows that appellant’s counsel did object to the court ruling on the child support issue on the basis of financial affidavits yet to be filed, concerning which counsel had no opportunity to cross-examine. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.611. It does not appear that other evidence sufficient to justify the support award was adduced regularly before the court. See Hagin v. Hagin, 353 So.2d 949 (Fla.2d DCA 1978).

REVERSED.

MILLS, C. J. and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Anderson
642 So. 2d 1121 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Marrero v. Marrero
472 So. 2d 886 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
373 So. 2d 965, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estes-v-estes-fladistctapp-1979.