Estes v. Davies

96 S.E. 11, 22 Ga. App. 379, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 347
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 16, 1918
Docket9399
StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E. 11 (Estes v. Davies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estes v. Davies, 96 S.E. 11, 22 Ga. App. 379, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 347 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodwobth, J.

It appearing from the record in this case that the petition to set aside the judgment of the superior court was filed in vacation, the trial judge erred in overruling the motion to dismiss the petition on that ground. “A judge of the superior cqurt has no authority to entertain a motion made in vacation to set aside a judgment of that court.” Haskens v. State, 114 Ga. 837 (40 S. E. 997); Chapman v. State, 116 Ga. 598 (42 S. E. 999); Malsby v. Studstill, 127 Ga. 726, 728 (56 S. E. 988); Gillespie v. Farkas, 19 Ga. App. 158 (3) (91 S. E. 244).

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, P. J., and 'Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haskens v. State
40 S.E. 997 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Chapman v. State
42 S.E. 999 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Malsby & Co. v. Studstill
56 S.E. 988 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Gillespie v. Farkas
91 S.E. 244 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 S.E. 11, 22 Ga. App. 379, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estes-v-davies-gactapp-1918.