Estes v. Comm'r

2014 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 29
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Estes v. Comm'r. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 T.C.M. 1053
United States Tax Court·Decided January 27, 2014·No. Docket No. 16528-11 L.·Unpublished

Opinion

STEVEN R. ESTES, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Estes v. Comm'r
Docket No. 16528-11 L.
United States Tax Court
2014 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 29;
January 27, 2014, Entered
Estes v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2014-9, 2014 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 9 (T.C., 2014)
*29 Jonathan M. Hauck, Petitioner Counsel, Pro se Washington, DC.
Kathleen Kerrigan, Judge.

Kathleen Kerrigan
DECISION

Pursuant to the determination of this Court as set forth in its Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion (T.C. Memo. 2014-9), filed January 13, 2014, it is

ORDERED AND DECIDED that respondent may proceed with the collection action for petitioner's unpaid Federal income tax liabilities for the tax years 2004, 2005, and 2006, as described in the Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) under Section 6320 and/or 6330 dated June 9, 2011.

(Signed) Kathleen Kerrigan

Judge

Entered: JAN 27 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estes v. Comm'r, 2014 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 29 (2014).

2014 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 29 (Estes v. Comm'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estes v. Comm'r
2014 T.C. Memo. 9 (U.S. Tax Court, 2014)