Estes v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co.

158 So. 25
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Estes v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 157 So. 395
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 10, 1934·No. No. 14980.·Published

Opinion

Our original decree was rendered against Alberta Kinsey and Ætna Casualty Surety Company, in solido. Our attention is called to the fact that by supplemental petition the Ætna Life Insurance Company was substituted as a party defendant for Ætna Casualty Surety Company. The decree should, therefore, have been rendered against Alberta Kinsey and Ætna Life Insurance Company.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that our decree be amended by the substitution of Ætna Life Insurance Company for Ætna Casualty Surety Company, and as thus amended that it be reinstated. The application of Alberta Kinsey for a rehearing is refused. The right of Ætna Life Insurance Company to apply for rehearing is reserved.

Decree amended.

Rehearing refused.

*Page 26

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estes v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co., 158 So. 25 (La. Ct. App. 1934).

158 So. 25 (Estes v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.